America’s Blame Game: Scapegoating India While Ignoring Its Own Role in Global Chaos

The United States is quick to point fingers, but it’s got a lot to answer for itself. Recently, former President Donald Trump went after India, accusing it of fueling Russia’s war in Ukraine by buying its oil and hitting India with a 25% tariff on goods as punishment. His aide Stephen Miller backed him up, calling India’s energy deals with Russia “unacceptable” and blaming them for Ukrainian deaths. This paints India as the bad guy in a war it didn’t start, conveniently ignoring how America’s own moves sparked the Russia-Ukraine conflict and pushed India toward Russia decades ago. It’s time to hold a mirror to the USA’s double standards—from Cold War betrayals to today’s bullying—and show why India’s choices, like the bold Sethusamudram project, are about standing firm, not causing trouble.

Trump’s Attack: Pinning Ukraine’s Pain on India 

On July 30, 2025, Trump took to Truth Social, blasting India for its “way-too-high” tariffs and its growing purchases of Russian oil, which he said bankroll Russia’s war machine. He slapped a 25% tariff on Indian goods and threatened an extra “penalty” for India’s energy and arms deals with Russia, calling both countries “dead economies” that can “crash together.” He even tied India’s oil imports—about 36% of its crude supply in 2024—to Russia’s ability to “keep killing in Ukraine.” Stephen Miller piled on during Fox News’ Sunday Morning Futures on August 3, 2025, acting shocked that India rivals China as a top buyer of Russian oil and demanding it stop. Trump also floated 100% “secondary tariffs” on countries trading with Russia unless Moscow agrees to a Ukraine peace deal, which could cost India billions in trade losses.

This isn’t just tough talk—it’s a low blow at a key partner. Trump’s words make India sound like it’s complicit in Ukraine’s suffering, ignoring its need to keep power running for 1.4 billion people on a tight budget. India didn’t blink. Its Foreign Ministry called its Russia ties “steady and time-tested,” not up for outsiders to judge. Petroleum Minister Hardeep Singh Puri shrugged off the threats, saying India buys oil from 40 countries and will handle any fallout. India’s standing its ground, and it should—because the Ukraine war’s real story starts with America, not India.

America’s role in the Ukraine Mess 

Let’s cut to the chase: the Russia-Ukraine war, which kicked off with Russia’s 2022 invasion, didn’t just happen out of the blue. It’s tied to years of US policies that have angered Russia. After the Soviet Union fell, the US promised not to expand NATO eastward, but then it welcomed countries like Poland and the Baltics, creeping closer to Russia’s borders. By 2008, the US was pushing NATO membership for Ukraine, which Moscow saw as a big red line. The 2014 Ukraine crisis, fueled by US-backed protests to boot out a pro-Russia leader, led to Russia grabbing Crimea and stirring up trouble in Donbas. US officials like Victoria Nuland were even caught on tape picking Ukraine’s new leaders.

Since 2022, the US has poured over $55 billion in weapons into Ukraine, keeping the fight going while brushing off talks about NATO expansion or neutrality. Trump’s own flip-flopping—cutting Ukraine aid in 2025 while cozying up to Putin—shows he’s more about looking tough than finding peace. Blaming India for buying Russian oil ignores how US sanctions created the cheap oil market India tapped into. America’s moves—provoking Russia, arming Ukraine, and shaking up global trade—set this war in motion, not India’s energy deals.

India’s Russia Ties: A Response to US Betrayals

India’s ties with Russia aren’t about funding wars—they’re about keeping the country running. When Western sanctions made Russian oil a bargain after 2022, India’s imports jumped from 3% to 36% of its supply. For a country that imports 90% of its energy, this was a smart move, saving billions to fuel growth. India’s arms deals, like the $5.4 billion S-400 missile system, also come from necessity, rooted in a history shaped by US missteps.

Back in the Cold War, the US backed Pakistan’s dictators, sending tanks used against India in 1965 and a naval fleet to intimidate India in 1971 during the Bangladesh crisis. When China attacked India in 1962, the US barely helped. These let-downs pushed India toward the Soviet Union, leading to the 1971 Indo-Soviet Treaty for arms and support. Russia’s reliability—supplying over a third of India’s arms from 2019 to 2023—stands in contrast to the US arming Pakistan, even as it backed terrorism like the 2008 Mumbai attacks. India’s Russia ties are a response to US unreliability, not a plan to drag out Ukraine’s war.

Sethusamudram: India’s Big Move to Stand Tall 

India’s not just pushing back against US pressure through oil and arms deals—it’s making bold moves to shape its own future. Take the Sethusamudram project, a planned shipping canal between India and Sri Lanka through the Palk Strait. This canal would let ships skip the long route around Sri Lanka, cutting costs and time for India’s $450 billion trade industry. It’s a huge deal for India’s economy and its clout in the Indian Ocean, a region the US wants to control through groups like the Quad.

Why’s this a big deal? Because Sethusamudram shows India carving its own path, free from US bullying. While Trump demands India ditch Russian oil or arms, projects like this prove India’s focused on its own goals—boosting trade, securing its seas, and standing tall as a global player. It’s another sign India won’t let America call the shots, whether in Ukraine or closer to home.

The USA’s Double Standards 

Trump’s outrage at India’s oil purchases is packed with hypocrisy. The US itself buys Russian uranium and fuel, worth $1 billion in 2024, despite its own sanctions. Europe imported 22 billion euros in Russian energy last year, yet India gets the blame. Why? Because India’s an easy target—a rising power that won’t bow down. Trump’s tariffs are less about Ukraine and more about cutting the $45 billion US-India trade deficit to please his “MAGA” crowd.

This isn’t new. During Trump’s first term, the US forced India to cut Iranian oil imports to zero, costing billions, only to now punish it for buying Russian oil instead. It’s a pattern: America demands loyalty while ignoring how its sanctions and wars push countries like India into tough spots.

India’s Stand: Choosing Its Own Path 

India’s not falling for Trump’s blame game. Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal fired back, calling India the “world’s fastest-growing major economy,” not the “dead” one Trump claimed. India is buying oil from 40 countries, including $15 billion from the US in 2024, with plans to hit $25 billion soon. But it won’t drop Russia just because the US says so. This is India doing its own thing—balancing ties with the US, Russia, and others to protect its 1.4 billion people. From US let-downs in the Cold War to enabling Pakistan’s terrorism, India has learned that trusting America blindly is a bad bet.

America, Look in the Mirror 

Trump’s attack on India is a dodge from America’s own mess-ups. Its push for NATO expansion, meddling in Ukraine, and sanctions that rewrote global trade set the stage for the Russia-Ukraine war. India’s oil purchases are just a practical response to that chaos, not the cause of Ukrainian deaths. The US can’t keep pointing fingers while ignoring its role in global trouble. From arming Pakistan’s dictators to destabilizing places like Iraq and Libya, America’s track record screams power over principle.

If the US wants India as a real partner, it needs to stop the bullying and own its mistakes. India is navigating a world shaped by America’s actions, from Cold War betrayals to today’s tariff threats. It’s not about funding wars—it’s about securing a nation of 1.4 billion. The US could learn a thing or two from India’s grit. Until it does, India’s smart to keep its guard up and its options open.

So, what do you think? Should India trust the US, or keep carving its own path with moves like Sethusamudram? Share your thoughts below!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Taxpayers money, Austerity drive and the Political Class

Going by the news reports on the spending of tax payers money by the MPs and ministers and governments one would wonder when will we the people of India get a break and how long these political class test our patience. At times during national calamities we in corporate or in private sector donate a days salary to the prime minister's relief fund etc. During economic down turn some of the corporate leaders take a cut in their salaries and employees were asked to reduce the travel costs etc. The political leaders who are supposed to lead by an example are not willing to do the same way as the salaried class. They do not want to give up their luxuries like stay in five star hotels or business class travel in air. They come out with all the excuses why they should not be giving up the luxuries. They spend a lakh a night in the five star hotels at the expense of taxpayer money. In simple words, the political leaders and ministers do not want to mingle with the common person, interact w...
Read more

Strategic importance of Sethusamudram project

Image
"India never lost her independence till she lost the command of the sea in the first decade of the 16th Century". ---Kavalam Pannikar the architect of India's naval doctrine Maritime power represents military, political, and economic power, exerted through an ability to use the sea or deny its use to others. It has traditionally been employed to control "use-of-the-sea" activities undertaken by nations for their general economic welfare and, often, even for their very survival. Maritime power and naval power are not synonymous, the latter being a sub-set of the former. Traditional land powers are more and more focusing on developing their maritime capabilities to safeguard their economic interests and extend their sphere of influence. India's fractious polity continues to limit its economic and military potential. Nor have been able to lend a strategic purpose to India’s foreign and economic policies. Now a days there is a lot of fuss around Sethusamudram p...
Read more

An Essay on the Hindu way of Life

" The Hindu man drinks religiously, sleeps religiously, walks religiously, marries religiously, robs religiously." - Swami Vivekananda Hinduism is not considered as a religion but a way of life, because religion is deeply interwoven into the life of a Hindu, the way nerves are interwoven in our bodies. It is very difficult to separate living and religion in the life of a devout Hindu. Both are inseparable. Both compliment each other. Both exist because of each other and both would lose their meaning and significance without the other. Religion is the center of living and living is the center of religion. In this article we try to understand the philosophy hidden behind this beautiful and noble concept of human life. We will try to understand why a Hindu considers his religion as a way of life instead of calling it a way of worshipping God or following a particular set of beliefs. Religion is there in every aspect of a Hindu's life. Religion is his inseparable companion, ...
Read more